June 16, 2025

2001 times

2001 times

Latest news YouTuber Dhruv Rathee Under Fire: Why the Silence on Bengal Murder Case?

Controversy Surrounds YouTuber’s Focus on Secularism Amidst Demand for Murder Case Coverage

Popular YouTuber Dhruv Rathee is facing backlash from his audience following his delay in addressing a recent high-profile murder rape case of doctor  in RG kar medicine college in Bengal . The controversy intensified after he posted a video on Instagram discussing secularism and criticizing the current Prime Minister’s approach to religion in politics.

Criticism of Secularism Commentary

Few days ago, Rathee posted a video on his Instagram account where he emphasized the importance of secularism in leadership. He suggested that Prime minister should emulate the principles of Muhammad Yunus, advocating for a leader who prioritizes secularism over religious affiliation. Rathee condemned politicians who use religion for political gain, claiming that such individuals are detrimental to society.

Delay in Covering Bengal Murder Case

In contrast to his recent secularism-focused content, Rathee has not yet addressed the Bengal murder case that has garnered significant public attention. This delay has led to criticism from viewers and followers who are eager for his insights on the matter. Many are questioning his apparent silence on this pressing issue, arguing that his commentary on secularism should align with a prompt and thorough examination of significant news events like the Bengal murder case.

Public Reaction
The public outcry has been substantial, with many fans and critics urging Rathee to provide his perspective on the Bengal case. They argue that his silence on the matter contradicts his usual engagement with current events and social issues, leading to calls for an explanation.As the debate continues, Dhruv Rathee’s handling of both the Bengal murder case and his commentary on secularism remains a focal point of discussion. The YouTuber’s next moves will be closely watched as he navigates the criticism and decides on his approach to these contentious topics.

Share