Supreme Court Issues Stern Warning to Maharashtra Government Over Land Compensation Ladli Behna Yojana at

Court Threatens to Halt State Schemes if Compensation Dispute Remains Unresolved The Supreme Court has expressed severe dissatisfaction with the Maharashtra government’s handling of compensation for land acquisitions made decades ago. The court, led by Justice BR Gavai, has threatened to halt state government schemes, including the popular Ladli Behna Yojana, if the issue is not addressed promptly.

Historical Land Acquisition Dispute

The case revolves around land acquired by the state government in 1963, for which compensation has yet to be provided. The court highlighted that despite the acquisition occurring over six decades ago, the state has not settled the compensation issue. The Supreme Court has warned that if the Maharashtra government fails to resolve this matter, it will be compelled to stop ongoing state schemes.

Threat to Ladli Behna Yojana

The Ladli Behna Yojana, a significant initiative launched by the Maharashtra government to provide ₹1,500 monthly to women, could face suspension if the compensation issue is not resolved. The Supreme Court’s warning underscores the urgency for the state to address the compensation claims or face possible shutdowns of beneficial schemes like Ladli Behna Yojana.

Political Reactions and Clarifications

In response to the Supreme Court’s admonition, Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis assured that the Ladli Behna Yojana will continue undisturbed. At a recent event in Jalgaon, Fadnavis emphasized the scheme’s importance and dismissed concerns that it might be affected. He also rebuked independent MLA Ravi Rana, who had suggested that the scheme’s funds might be withdrawn if political support was not secured. Fadnavis dismissed these comments as mere speculation and assured the public of the scheme’s continuity.

Next Steps and Government Actions

The Supreme Court has instructed the Chief Secretary of Maharashtra to confer with the Chief Minister to devise a fair compensation plan. The court has emphasized that the state must comply with legal requirements for the land acquired in 1963 to avoid further legal and financial consequences.

As the state navigates this legal and political challenge, the outcome will be closely watched to determine the future of both the compensation claims and key welfare schemes like the Ladli Behna Yojana.